<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AVMA@Work - American Veterinary Medical Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atwork.avma.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atwork.avma.org</link>
	<description>News and updates on what the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) is doing to advance the veterinary medical profession and protect the interests of veterinarians and the animals and humans they serve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Policy on Not-for-Profits Delivering Veterinary Services by Ruth Beismer, DVM</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/05/01/new-policy-on-not-for-profits-delivering-veterinary-services/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Beismer, DVM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3700#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2804&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Adrian &lt;/a&gt; 
Thank you for that information.  It would seem that veterinarians have very good grounds for their objections to these businesses, and that the IRS agrees.  Perhaps we should all start reporting these groups to the IRS and let them do the inquiries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2804" rel="nofollow">@Adrian </a><br />
Thank you for that information.  It would seem that veterinarians have very good grounds for their objections to these businesses, and that the IRS agrees.  Perhaps we should all start reporting these groups to the IRS and let them do the inquiries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Policy on Not-for-Profits Delivering Veterinary Services by Adrian</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/05/01/new-policy-on-not-for-profits-delivering-veterinary-services/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3700#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, a survey of legal issues that often arise when considering the business activities of not-for-profit and tax-exempt organizations that provide veterinary medical care for a fee was prepared as background to the new policy. This resource can be found at http://atwork.avma.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/AVMA-Veterinary-Services-Backgrounder-5-1-12.pdf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, a survey of legal issues that often arise when considering the business activities of not-for-profit and tax-exempt organizations that provide veterinary medical care for a fee was prepared as background to the new policy. This resource can be found at <a href="http://atwork.avma.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/AVMA-Veterinary-Services-Backgrounder-5-1-12.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://atwork.avma.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/AVMA-Veterinary-Services-Backgrounder-5-1-12.pdf</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Talking Pets – and Pet Health Care by Medvet</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/04/25/talking-pets-and-pet-health-care/#comment-2802</link>
		<dc:creator>Medvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3627#comment-2802</guid>
		<description>Thank you, it&#039;s very good news. We are waiting for these innovations will come into force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, it&#8217;s very good news. We are waiting for these innovations will come into force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missouri’s Prop B: The “Puppy Mill Initiative” by Maria Jaramillo</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2010/11/04/missouri-prop-b/#comment-2773</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Jaramillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 16:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=956#comment-2773</guid>
		<description>I am just an irritated and heart broken consumer.  
 
On February 29, 2012, I purchased two puppies from a local pet store.  This event embarked me on a trip; which I was clearly not prepared for.  It has been a road full of twists and turns; but mainly of enlightenment.  
 
Unknown to me, these two puppies appeared to have come from a puppy mill operation in Missouri.  Both dogs became gravely ill a few days later.  Both were originally suspected to have distemper which was ruled out by my vet.  They actually had bacterial pneumonia which require 24-hour IV treatments.  After several weeks of hard work, mainly be me, the dogs got better.  I did have the incredible dedication of my own vet nd the local emergency clinic.  I refused to take the puppies to the vets recommended by the pet store.  
 
All the work and stress took a devastating toll on my health.  These puppies by having a very questionable beginning at a puppy mill (which now has current USDA violations), a grueling transport to the State of Florida, and an almost fatal infection,  proved to be a challenge to me.  I was not able to climb that cliff.  I developed an extremely painful condition of plantar fasciitis with a heel spur.  I had to surrendered the puppies to the local SPCA.  I was told a few days later that they were adopted.
 
I was left alone with no puppies, no savings, and a heartache that will take years to recover from.  
 
As I am picking out the pieces, I became aware that the Pet Store acquired the pets through their own broker’s license from a breeder with known USDA violations.  The puppies were apparently examined by local vet from a well-known national chain.  Vaccinations and exam were reported to have been administered by him on February 23, 2012, as he signed the report.  
 
I am appalled that a doctor in veterinary medicine would even consider have an exclusive agreement with a puppy broker who is well-known to acquire puppies from breeders with known USDA violations.  I find this practice extremely unethical.  I was told that I needed to go the vets with agreement with the pet store in order not to incur additional expenses.  
 
I certainly hope that you organization is considering issuing ethical standards regarding exclusive agreements of veterinarians with Pet Stores.  The initial certificate of inspection provided to me does not have any information regarding the initial veterinary visit as required by State Law.   At a minimum, these vets needs to know where these puppies come from, how they were transported and assure that the breeder has a current favorable inspection with the USDA.  A copy of of all the transfers of ownership with the appropriate USDA licenses need to be on the certificate and reviewed by the doctor.    I frankly feel that puppy stores need to include pictures of the mother, father and litter before they can sell a puppy.  We need to know where these puppies came from.  
 
The argument that additional red tape would create hardship to the vet clinics is not a valid one.  The vets are surely not shy to charge $1,000 for an overnight stay.  
 
This practice of allowing vets to clear puppies to be sold at local pet stores needs to be challenged in the local, state and national level.  Many of these puppies end up dead, caged, tied up in a yard, abandoned or surrendered.  I find it quite ironic that we are pouring millions of dollars to the Humane Society and the SPCA to take care of these same puppies, which were initially examined by a veterinarian.  We need to put an end to this.  
 
I feel that you could be a huge part to the solution.  In the mean time, I will continue my letter writing campaign.  I am writing everyone that I can think of to end the suffering of these puppy mill unhealthy puppies and the unsuspected owners who buy them.  Let my pain be a lesson.  Let my pain be a the energy for change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just an irritated and heart broken consumer.  </p>
<p>On February 29, 2012, I purchased two puppies from a local pet store.  This event embarked me on a trip; which I was clearly not prepared for.  It has been a road full of twists and turns; but mainly of enlightenment.  </p>
<p>Unknown to me, these two puppies appeared to have come from a puppy mill operation in Missouri.  Both dogs became gravely ill a few days later.  Both were originally suspected to have distemper which was ruled out by my vet.  They actually had bacterial pneumonia which require 24-hour IV treatments.  After several weeks of hard work, mainly be me, the dogs got better.  I did have the incredible dedication of my own vet nd the local emergency clinic.  I refused to take the puppies to the vets recommended by the pet store.  </p>
<p>All the work and stress took a devastating toll on my health.  These puppies by having a very questionable beginning at a puppy mill (which now has current USDA violations), a grueling transport to the State of Florida, and an almost fatal infection,  proved to be a challenge to me.  I was not able to climb that cliff.  I developed an extremely painful condition of plantar fasciitis with a heel spur.  I had to surrendered the puppies to the local SPCA.  I was told a few days later that they were adopted.</p>
<p>I was left alone with no puppies, no savings, and a heartache that will take years to recover from.  </p>
<p>As I am picking out the pieces, I became aware that the Pet Store acquired the pets through their own broker’s license from a breeder with known USDA violations.  The puppies were apparently examined by local vet from a well-known national chain.  Vaccinations and exam were reported to have been administered by him on February 23, 2012, as he signed the report.  </p>
<p>I am appalled that a doctor in veterinary medicine would even consider have an exclusive agreement with a puppy broker who is well-known to acquire puppies from breeders with known USDA violations.  I find this practice extremely unethical.  I was told that I needed to go the vets with agreement with the pet store in order not to incur additional expenses.  </p>
<p>I certainly hope that you organization is considering issuing ethical standards regarding exclusive agreements of veterinarians with Pet Stores.  The initial certificate of inspection provided to me does not have any information regarding the initial veterinary visit as required by State Law.   At a minimum, these vets needs to know where these puppies come from, how they were transported and assure that the breeder has a current favorable inspection with the USDA.  A copy of of all the transfers of ownership with the appropriate USDA licenses need to be on the certificate and reviewed by the doctor.    I frankly feel that puppy stores need to include pictures of the mother, father and litter before they can sell a puppy.  We need to know where these puppies came from.  </p>
<p>The argument that additional red tape would create hardship to the vet clinics is not a valid one.  The vets are surely not shy to charge $1,000 for an overnight stay.  </p>
<p>This practice of allowing vets to clear puppies to be sold at local pet stores needs to be challenged in the local, state and national level.  Many of these puppies end up dead, caged, tied up in a yard, abandoned or surrendered.  I find it quite ironic that we are pouring millions of dollars to the Humane Society and the SPCA to take care of these same puppies, which were initially examined by a veterinarian.  We need to put an end to this.  </p>
<p>I feel that you could be a huge part to the solution.  In the mean time, I will continue my letter writing campaign.  I am writing everyone that I can think of to end the suffering of these puppy mill unhealthy puppies and the unsuspected owners who buy them.  Let my pain be a lesson.  Let my pain be a the energy for change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iams ProActive Health Smart Puppy Dry Dog Food Recall by Inocuidad de los alimentos para mascotas USA &#124; Sitio Web de Información de Alimentación Canina &#124; Alimentación natural canina &#124; Alimentación natural para perros</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2011/12/06/iams-proactive-health-smart-puppy-dry-dog-food-recall/#comment-2769</link>
		<dc:creator>Inocuidad de los alimentos para mascotas USA &#124; Sitio Web de Información de Alimentación Canina &#124; Alimentación natural canina &#124; Alimentación natural para perros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=2804#comment-2769</guid>
		<description>[...] Iams ProActive Health Smart Puppy Dry Dog Food Recall (06 December 2011) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iams ProActive Health Smart Puppy Dry Dog Food Recall (06 December 2011) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cargill Dog Food Recall Due to Aflatoxin by Inocuidad de los alimentos para mascotas USA &#124; Sitio Web de Información de Alimentación Canina &#124; Alimentación natural canina &#124; Alimentación natural para perros</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2011/12/07/cargill-dog-food-recall-due-to-aflatoxin/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator>Inocuidad de los alimentos para mascotas USA &#124; Sitio Web de Información de Alimentación Canina &#124; Alimentación natural canina &#124; Alimentación natural para perros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=2833#comment-2768</guid>
		<description>[...] Cargill Dog Food Recall Due to Aflatoxin (06 December 2011) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cargill Dog Food Recall Due to Aflatoxin (06 December 2011) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response to Reader’s Digest by Mary Esterhammer-Fic, CVT</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/04/13/a-response-to-readers-digest/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Esterhammer-Fic, CVT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3542#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>Thank you for responding to the Reader&#039;s Digest article. I&#039;ve sent them my own response regarding the suggestion that feline vaccines are unnecessary past kittenhood. That really undermines our efforts to encourage clients to bring in their cats for preventive care. I would much rather help a client keep a pet healthy than see the cat only when it&#039;s seriously ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for responding to the Reader&#8217;s Digest article. I&#8217;ve sent them my own response regarding the suggestion that feline vaccines are unnecessary past kittenhood. That really undermines our efforts to encourage clients to bring in their cats for preventive care. I would much rather help a client keep a pet healthy than see the cat only when it&#8217;s seriously ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Multistate Salmonella Outbreak from Dry Dog Food by Notice: Pet Food Recall &#124; Piedmont Veterinary Clinic</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/05/04/multistate-salmonella-outbreak-from-dry-dog-food/#comment-2702</link>
		<dc:creator>Notice: Pet Food Recall &#124; Piedmont Veterinary Clinic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3746#comment-2702</guid>
		<description>[...] While the FDA and CDC are continuing their investigation, a voluntary recall of some sub-brands of Diamond Pet Foods has been issued. Please visit this link for the latest information and recall list:  AVMA information regarding Diamond Pet Food Recall [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While the FDA and CDC are continuing their investigation, a voluntary recall of some sub-brands of Diamond Pet Foods has been issued. Please visit this link for the latest information and recall list:  AVMA information regarding Diamond Pet Food Recall [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President&#8217;s Update &#8211; NAVC &amp; our Meeting with AAVMC Deans by René A. Carlson, DVM</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/01/19/presidents-update-navc-our-meeting-with-aavmc-deans/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>René A. Carlson, DVM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3060#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right, as long as there is demand for those spots, the applicants meet the admission requirements, and people are willing to pay the price of tuition, school&#039;s will continue to fill those spots.  That demand for seats and the loss of government support financially for the schools drives the increasing class sizes and even the establishment of new programs. However the applicant pool is stagnant, meaning the ratio of the total number of students who apply to the total number of seats available across the country is only 2:1.  That low of a ratio causes some concern about whether the quality of the total applicant pool will diminish.  Our goal is to be sure we help students understand the debt, manage it, and help students be as confident and competent as possible once they graduate to be more productive  so as to have better income potential. In addition, we must educate the public on the value of veterinary medical consultation and services to increase demand.  We are working hard in all areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right, as long as there is demand for those spots, the applicants meet the admission requirements, and people are willing to pay the price of tuition, school&#8217;s will continue to fill those spots.  That demand for seats and the loss of government support financially for the schools drives the increasing class sizes and even the establishment of new programs. However the applicant pool is stagnant, meaning the ratio of the total number of students who apply to the total number of seats available across the country is only 2:1.  That low of a ratio causes some concern about whether the quality of the total applicant pool will diminish.  Our goal is to be sure we help students understand the debt, manage it, and help students be as confident and competent as possible once they graduate to be more productive  so as to have better income potential. In addition, we must educate the public on the value of veterinary medical consultation and services to increase demand.  We are working hard in all areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on President&#8217;s Update &#8211; NAVC &amp; our Meeting with AAVMC Deans by Dentaire Hongrie</title>
		<link>http://atwork.avma.org/2012/01/19/presidents-update-navc-our-meeting-with-aavmc-deans/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dentaire Hongrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atwork.avma.org/?p=3060#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>As long as there are people willing to pay the price for a DVM degree, and they meet the qualifications of the admission process, can we expect the schools to not accept them if there is a spot available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as there are people willing to pay the price for a DVM degree, and they meet the qualifications of the admission process, can we expect the schools to not accept them if there is a spot available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

